Bruno Cancian de Araujo, Stefan Schmidt, Thomas von Rintelen, Hari Sutrisno, Kristina von Rintelen, Rosichon Ubaidillah, Chrisoph Hauser, Djunijanti Peggie, Raden Pramesa Narakusumo, Michael Balke
| Abstract views: 1322 | PDF views: 611


A status report with preliminary results for the IndoBioSys project is presented and the impact of the project results for our knowledge of the Indonesian fauna is discussed. Using the REST API available on the Barcode of Life Data System we recover 21,153 public records (3,390 BINs) from Indonesia and compare against the 21,813 records (3,580 BINs) generated by the IndoBioSys project. From all IndoBioSys BINs, 3,366 (94%) are new to Indonesia. IndoBioSys is responsible for a BIN increase of 36.5% in Lepidoptera, 62.6% in Trichoptera, 986% in Coleoptera, and 1,086% in Hymenoptera. After two years of the IndoBioSys project, the Museum Zoologicum Bogoriense became the depository institution of 51.9% of Lepidoptera records, 95.8% of Coleoptera records, 97.6% of Hymenoptera records and 59.4% of Trichoptera records for Indonesia available on Barcode of Life Data System (BOLD). Now, with 55% of all Indonesian records available on BOLD, it is the most important depository for records of Indonesian genetic biodiversity, housing more than 23,000 new voucher specimens in their collections. Before IndoBioSys, the Museum Zoologicum Bogoriense was responsible for only 9% of all records available in the Barcode of Life Data System for Indonesia, showing the importance of those pipelines in empowering the local institutions in becoming the reference depository of the local fauna.


biodiversity inventory, CO1, DNA barcode, high–throughput pipeline, metabarcode

Full Text:



Carolyn, R.D., D.P.T. Baskoro & L.B. Prasetyo 2013. Analisis degradasi untuk penyusunan arahan strategi pengendaliannya di Taman Nasional Gunung Halimun-Salak Provinsi Jawa Barat. Globe 15(1): 39–47. <>

Dinc?, V., V.A. Lukhtanov, G. Talavera & R. Vila 2011. Unexpected layers of cryptic diversity in wood white Leptidea butterflies. Nature Communications 2: 324.

Geiger, M. F., J.J. Astrin, T. Borsch, U. Burkhardt, P. Grobe, R. Hand, A. Hausmann, K. Hohberg, L. Krogmann, M. Lutz, C. Monje, B. Misof, J. Morinière, K. Müller, S. Pietsch, D. Quandt, B. Rulik, M. Scholler, W. Traunspurger, G. Haszprunar & W. Wägele 2016. How to tackle the molecular species inventory for an industrialized nation—lessons from the first phase of the German Barcode of Life initiative GBOL (2012–2015). Genome 59(9): 661–670.

Hamilton, A. J., Y. Basset, K.K. Benke, P.S. Grimbacher, S.E. Miller, V. Novotný, G.A. Samuelson, N.E. Stork, G.D. Weiblen & J.D.L. Yen 2010. Quantifying uncertainty in estimation of tropical arthropod species richness. The American Naturalist 176(1): 90–95. <>

Hawlitschek, O., J. Morinière, G.U.C. Lehmann, A.W. Lehmann, M. Kropf, A. Dunz, F. Glaw, M. Detcharoen, S. Schmidt, A. Hausmann, N.U. Szucsich, S.A.Caetano-Wyler & G. Haszprunar 2016. DNA barcoding of crickets, katydids and grasshoppers (Orthoptera) from Central Europe with focus on Austria, Germany and Switzerland. Molecular Ecology Resources. DOI:10.1111/1755-0998.12638. <>

Hebert, P. D. N., J.R. de Waard, J. –F. Landry 2009. DNA barcodes for 1/1000 of the animal kingdom. Biology Letters 6(3): 359–362. <>

Hebert, P. D. N., S. Ratnasingham & J.R. deWaard 2003. Barcoding animal life: cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 divergences among closely related species. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 270: S96–S99.

Hebert, P.D.N., S. Ratnasingham, E.V. Zakharov, A.C. Telfer, V. Levesque-Beaudin, M.A. Milton, S. Pedersen, P. Jannetta & J.R. deWaard 2016. Counting animal species with DNA barcodes: Canadian insects. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 371: 1–10, 20150333.

Hendrich L, Pons J, Ribera I, Balke M. 2010. Mitochondrial Cox1 Sequence Data Reliably Uncover Patterns of Insect Diversity But Suffer from High Lineage–Idiosyncratic Error Rates. PLoS ONE 5(12): e14448. <>

Hendrich, L., J. Morinière, G. Haszprunar, P.D.N. Hebert, A. Hausmann, F. Kohler & M. Balke 2015. A comprehensive DNA barcode database for Central European beetles with a focus on Germany: adding more than 3500 identified species in BOLD. Molecular Ecology Resources 15(4): 795–818. <>

Karlsson, D. 2017. The Swedish Malaise Trap Project 2.0. Hamuli. 8(1): 6–7.

Kremen, C., R. Colwell, T. Erwin, D. Murphy, R. Noss & M. Sanjayan 1993. Terrestrial Arthropod Assemblages: Their Use in Conservation Planning. Conservation Biology 7(4): 796–808. <'s%20updated%20pub%20PDFs%2010Jan2014/111_1993_TerrestrialArthropodAssemblages_Conservation.pdf>

Miller. S.E., A. Hausmann, W. Hallwachs & D.H. Janzen 2016. Advancing taxonomy and bioinventories with DNA barcodes. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 371(1702): 20150339.

Morinière, J., L. Hendrich, A. Hausmann, P. Hebert, G. Haszprunar & A. Gruppe 2014. Barcoding Fauna Bavarica: 78% of the Neuropterida Fauna Barcoded!. PLoS ONE 9(10): e109719. <>

Ratnasingham, S. & P.D.N. Hebert 2007. BOLD: The Barcode of Life Data System ( Molecular Ecology Notes 7: 355–364. <>

Ratnasingham, S. & P.D.N. Hebert 2013. A DNA-based registry for all animal species: the Barcode Index Number (BIN) system. PLoS ONE 8(7): e66213. <>

Riedel, A., K. Sagata, Y.R. Suhardjono, R. Tänzler & M. Balke 2013. Integrative taxonomy on the fast track - towards more sustainability in biodiversity research. Frontiers in Zoologie 10(1): 15.

Ronquist, F. 2010. 250 Years of Swedish Taxonomy. In: Polaszek A. (ed.), Systema Naturae 250 - The Linnaean Ark. CRC Press. 239–248. <>

Schmidt, S., C. Schmid-Egger, J. Morinière, G. Haszprunar & P. Hebert 2015. DNA barcoding largely supports 250 years of classical taxonomy: identifications for Central European bees (Hymenoptera, Apoidea partim). Molecular Ecology Resources 15(4): 985–1000. <>

Schmidt, O., A. Hausmann, B. Cancian de Araujo, H. Sutrisno, D. Peggie & S. Schmidt 2017. A streamlined collecting and preparation protocol for DNA barcoding of Lepidoptera as part of large-scale rapid biodiversity assessment projects, exemplified by the Indonesian Biodiversity Discovery and Information System (IndoBioSys). Biodiversity Data Journal 5: e20006.

Wheeler, Q. & R. Meier 2000. Species Concepts and Phylogenetic Theory: a Debate. Columbia University Press.

Yu, D.W., Y. Ji, B.C. Emerson, X. Wang, C. Ye, C. Yang & Z. Ding 2012. Biodiversity soup: metabarcoding of arthropods for rapid biodiversity assessment and biomonitoring. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 3: 613–623.

Copyright (c) 2017 Research Center for Biology, Indonesian Institute of Sciences (LIPI)


  • There are currently no refbacks.