KARAKTERISASI 17 FAMILI IKAN NILA {Oreochromis niloticus) GENERASI KE TIGA (G-3) BERDASARKAN METODE TRUSS MORFOMETRIKS

Nuryadi Nuryadi, Otong Zenal Ariiin, Rudhy Gustiano, Mulyasari Mulyasari
10.14203/beritabiologi.v9i1.806
| Abstract views: 1906 | PDF views: 921

Abstract

Objective of the study is to elucidate phenotype characters of nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) of the third generation (G3)resulted from the selection breeding program in the Research Institute for Freshwater Aquaculture Bogor. Phenotypes of seventeen nile tilapia families, were observed using truss morphometric methods. The results showed that the composition average of standard lenght has low coefficient variation mean (10.42%) as well as coefficient variation of the truss measured characters (4.3- 13.3%). The highest index similarity of boddy shape within family was found in family 5 (79.3%), in contrast the lowest was in family 12 (32.3%). For index similarity between families, the highest score was in between family 12 and 17 (22.6).There were 8 characters enabled to differentiate the 17 families observed. They were Al, A3, A5, B2, C3, C5, C5, and D4. Cluster analyses recognized into 4 groups based on the phenotypic distance

Keywords

Karakterisasi, fenotip, metode truss morphometric, koefisien variasi, ikan nila, Oreochromis niloticus.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Begg GA, KD Friedland and JB Pearce. 1999. Stock identification and its role in stock assessment and fisheries management: an overview. Fisheries Research 43,1-8.

Booke HE. 1981. The conundrum of the stock concept - Are nature and nurture definable in fishery science? Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 38,1479-1480.

Blezinsky VJ and RW Doyle. 1988. A morphometrics criterion for sex discrimination in tilapia. In: RSV Pullin, T Bhukaswan, K Tonguthai and JL Maclan (Eds.) Production, Accessibility and Consumption Patterns of Aquaculture Products in the Philippines, 439-444 - Celestino Olalo.

Dunham RE. 1995. The contribution of genetically improved aquatic organisms to global food security. International Conference on "Sustainable Contribution of Fisheries to Food Security", 111. KC/Fl/Tech. 6. FAO. Rome.

Gustiano R and L Pouyaund. 2005. Phenetic analysis of 28 species Pangasiid catfishes from Asia. Zuriat 16, 66-72.

Gustiano R and L Pouyaund. 2007. Taxonomy and genetic relationships of Pangasiidae based on morphological and molecular analysis. Indonesian Aquaculture Journal 2,107-112.

Hansen MM, KLD Mensberg, G Rasmussen and V Simonsen. 1997. Genetic variation within and among danish brown trout (salmo trutta 1) hatchery strains assesed by pcr-rflp analysis of mithocondrial dna segments. Journal Aquaculture 153,16-29.

Hurlbut T and D Clay. 1998. Morphometric and meristic differences between shallow- and deep-water populations of white hake (Urophycis tenuis) in the southern Gulf of St. Lawrence. Canadian Journal Fisheries Aquatics Science 55,2274-2282.

Koh TL, G Khoo, LQ Fan and VPE Phang. 1999. Genetic diversity among wild forms and cultivated varieties of discus (Symphysodon spp.) as revealed by random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) fingerprinting. Aquacultur 173,485-497.

Livingston ME and KA Schofield. 1996. Stock discrimination of hoki (Macruronus novaezelandiae) in New Zealand waters using morphometrics. New Zealand Journal Marine Freshwater Resources 30, 197-208.

Masyud B. 1992. Identifikasi sifat satwa yang dilindungi, sisi penting kegiatan konservasi keanekaragaman hayati. Media Konservasi 3(4), 41-66.

Nugroho E, DJ Ferrell, P Smith and N Taniguchi. 2001. Genetic Divergence of Kingfish from Japan, Australia and New Zealand Inferred by Microsatellite DNA and Mitochondrial DNA Control Region Markers. Journal Fisheries Science 67, 843-850.

Nugroho E. 2002. Rapid fluctuation of genetic variability in artificially propagated population of red sea bream. Indonesian Journal Agriculture Biotechnology. Indonesian Agency for Agriculture Research and Development 7(1), 1-7.

Roby D, JD Lambert and JM S6vigny. 1991. Morphometric and electrophoretic approaches to discrimination of capelin (Mallotus villosus) populations in the Estuary and Gulf of St. Lawrence. Canadian Journal Fisheries Aquatics Science 48,2040-2050.

Strauss RE and FLBookstein, 1982. The truss: body form reconstruction in morphometrics. Syst. Zoology 31,113-135. SuciRS. 2007. Keragaman genetik udang windu (Pertaeiw monodon) berdasar karakter fenotipe morphometrik famili alam dan domestikasi di Pulau Seram, Maluku. Skripsi, Institut Pertanian Bogor. Bogor.

Suparyanto A, T Purwadaria dan Subandriyo. 1999. Pendugaan jarak genetik dan faktor peubah pembeda bangsa dan kelompok domba di Indonesia melalui pendekatan analisis morfologi. Jurnal Ilmu Ternak dan Veteriner 4,80-87.

Taniguchi N, K Sumantadinata dan S Iyam. 1983. Genetic change in the first and second generation of hatchery stock of black sea beam. Aquaculture 35,309-320

Velasco RR, MJR Pante, JM Macaranas, CC Janagap and AE Eknath. 1996. Truss morphometric characterization of eight strains of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus), 415-425. Dalam: RSV Pullin. J Lazard, M Legendre, JB Amon and Kothiasy D Pauly (Eds.). The Third International Symposium on Tilapia in Aquiculture. ICLARM Conference Proceding.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14203/beritabiologi.v9i1.806

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.