HASIL DAN STABILITAS HASIL BIJI KEDELAI {Glycine max (L.) Merr.} GALUR HARAPAN DI LAHAN SAWAH

Ayda Krisnawati, M Muchlish Adie, GWA Susanto
10.14203/beritabiologi.v12i1.524
| Abstract views: 335 | PDF views: 322

Abstract

Soybean {Glycine max (L.) Merr.} varieties with consistently high yield productivity across environments are expected to maintain its production level per area.The objectives of this experiment are to determine the magnitude of G × E interaction and to identify the stability of eight soybean promising lines across locations. Materials consists of eight soybean promising lines (G100H/SHRW-60-38, SHRW-60/G100H-73, SHRW-60/G100H-68, SHRW-60/G100H-66, G100H/SHRW-34, SHRW-60/G100H-5, SHRW-60/G100H-70 and SHRW-60/G 100 H-75) and two check varieties (Kaba and Wilis). The experiments were done in 16 locations (Lampung Tengah, Yogyakarta, Ngawi, Mojokerto, Pasuruan, Malang, Banyuwangi and Lombok Barat, two locations each) during the period of 2009 to 2011. A randomized completely block design with four replicates was used in each location. AMMI analysis (Additive Main Effects and Multiplicative Interaction) was applied to assess the yield stability of those 10 genotypes, and then interpreted in biplot graphic of seed yield for principal components 1 (IPCA1) with the principal component 2 (IPCA2). Seed yield of the 10 soybean lines ranged from 2.63-3.02 t/ha, with 2.81 t/ha in average. The highest yield was obtained by G6 (SHRW-60/G100H-5), whereas G3 (SHRW-60/G100H-68) had the lowest seed yield.The combined analysis showed that lines, locations, and the interaction of lines and locations (G × L) were significantly different for seed yield.The first four Interaction Principal Component Axes (IPCA1, IPCA2, IPCA3 and IPCA4) were significant and accounted for 85.1% of the total GEI. Lines of G100H/SHRW-60-38 (G1), SHRW-60/G100H-66 (G4) and SHRW-60/G100H-5 (G6) were stable and high yielding, and therefore they are proposed to be released as new varieties. The results of this study also suggested that Kaba and Willis were used as specific-check varieties, due to its site-specific adaptability.

Keywords

Soybean {Glycine max (L.) Merr.}, G × E interaction, yield stability

Full Text:

PDF

References

Admassu S, M Nigussie and H Zelleke. 2008. Genotypeenvironment interaction and stability analysis for grain yield of maize (Zea mays L.) in Ethiopia. Asian J.Plant Sci. 7, 163-169

Arsyad DM dan A Nur. 2006. Analisis AMMI untuk stabilitas hasil galur-galur kedelai di lahan kering masam. Penelitian Pertanian 25(2), 78–84.

Becker HC and J Leon. 1988. Stability analysis in plant breeding. Plant Breeding 101, 1- 23.

Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS). 2012. Produksi padi, jagung, dan kedelai (angka tetap 2011 dan angka ramalan I 2012). Berita Resmi Statistik 43 (07): 1-10.

Crossa J. 1990. Statistical analyses of multilocation trials. Adv.Agron. 44, 55-85.

Fehr WR. 1987. Principles of Cultivar Development Vol 1, Theory and Technique. Macmillan Publishing Co. New York.

Gauch Jr, HG and RW Zobel. 1996. AMMI analysis of yield trials, 85-122. In: MS Kang and HG Gauch, Jr. (Eds.). Genotype-by-Environment Interaction. CRC Press, Boca Raton. New York, United States of America.

Gauch, H.G. and R.W. Zobel. 1997. Identifying megaenvironments and targeting genotypes. Crop. Sci. 37, 311–326.

Hadi AF dan H Sa’diyah. 2004. Model AMMI untuk analisis interaksi galur x lokasi. Ilmu Dasar 5(1), 33-41.

Hernandez MV and J Crossa. 2000. The AMMI Analysis and Graphing the Biplot. CIMMYT. INT. Mexico.

Kaya Y, Palta and S Taner. 2002. Additive main effects and multiplicative interactions analysis of yield performances in bread wheat genotypes across environments. Turk J. Agric For. 26, 275-279.

Kearsey MJ and HS Pooni. 1996. The Genetical Analysis of Quantitative Traits. Chapman & Hall. London.

Krisnawati dan MM Adie. 2009. Stabilitas dan hasil beberapa galur kedelai. Penelitian Pertanian 28(3), 170-175.

Lin CS, MR Binns and LP Lefkovitch. 1986. Stability parameters: where do we stand. Crop Sci. 26, 894-900.

Mather K and JL Jinks. 1982. Biometrical Genetics/ The Study of Continuous Variation. Chapman and Hall, London, New York.

Mattjik AA. 1998. Aplikasi analisis pengaruh utama aditif dengan interaksi ganda (UAIG) pada data simulasi. Forum Statistik dan Komputasi 3(1), 20-26.

Mukai T. 1988. Genotype-environment interaction in relation to the maintenance of genetic variability in populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Quantitative Genetics, 21-31. (BS Weir, EJ Eisen, M M Goodman, and G Namkoong.(Editors).

Nasrullah. 1981. A Modified procedure for indentifying varietal stability. Agric. Sci. 3(4), 153- 159.

Oliviera de AB, JB Duarte and JB Pinheiro. 2003. Application of AMMI analysis in the assessment of yield stability in soybean. Pesq. Agropec. Bras. 38(3), 357-364.

Rocha M, NA Vello, AC Lopes and MCC Maia. 2009. Yield stability of soybean lines using additive main effects and multiplicative interaction analysis - AMMI. Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology. Brazilian Society of Plant Breeding. http://www.cababstractsplus.org/abstracts/ Abstract.aspx?AcNo=200531 (akses 9 Juni 2009).

Samonte SOPB, LT Wilson, AM McClung and JC Medley. 2005. Targeting cultivar onto rice growing environment using AMMI and SREG GGE biplot analysis. Crop Sci. 45, 2414-2424.

Sanni KA, OJ Ariyo, DK Ojo, G Gregorio, EA Somado, I Sanchez, M Sie, K Futakuchi, SA Ogunbayo, RG Guei and MCS Wopereis. 2009. Additive main effects and multiplicative interactions analysis of grain yield performances in rice genotypes across environments. Asian J. of Plant Sci. 8(1), 48-53.

Singh RK and BD Chaudhary. 1979. Biometrical Method in Quantitative Genetic Analysis. Kalyani Publisher. New Delhi.

Sivapalan S, L O’Brien, GO Ferrara, GL Hollamby, I Barclay and PJ Martin. 2000. An adaptation analysis of Australian and CIMMYT/ICARDA wheat germplasm in Australian production environments. Aust. J. Agric.Res. 51, 903-915.

Soemartono dan Nasrullah. 1988. Genetika Kuantitatif. PAU–Bioteknologi. UGM.

Suryati D dan M Chozin. 2007. Analisis stabilitas galur-galur harapan kedelai keturunan dari persilangan Malabar dan Kipas Putih. Akta Agrosia Edisi Khusus 2, 176-180.

Sutjihno. 1996. Calculation of AMMI model using MSTAT program. Penelitian Pertanian 15, 38-42.

Tarakanovas P and V Ruzgas. 2006. Additive main effect and multiplicative interaction analysis of grain yield of wheat varieties in Lithuania. Agronomy Research 4(1), 91-98.

Van Oosterom EJ, D Kleijn, S Ceccarelli and MM Nachit. 1993. Genotype-by-environment interactions of barley in the Mediterranean region. Crop Sci. 33, 669-674.

Vargas M and J Crossa. 2000. The AMMI analysis and graphing the biplot. Biometrics and Statistics Unit, CIMMYT. www.cimmyt.cgiar.org/biometrics (akses tanggal 12 Maret 2010).

Wu RL and DM OíMalley. 1998. Nonlinear genotypic response to macro- and microenvironments. Theor. and App.Gen. 96, 669-675.

Yang RC and RJ Baker. 1991. Genotype x Environment interactions in two wheat crosses. Crop. Sci. 31, 63-87.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14203/beritabiologi.v12i1.524

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.