STUDI ETNOEKOLOGI MASYARAKAT ADAT TRAH BONOKELING DI BANYUMAS DAN CILACAP

Indah Anugrah Sari, Sulistijorini Sulistijorini, Yohanes Purwanto
10.14203/beritabiologi.v19i1.3785
| Abstract views: 1274 | PDF views: 1347

Abstract

The Bonokeling society is a part of the Javanese indigenous groups who still maintain and practise the local wisdom in their daily lives. Socio-cultural research concerning the Bonokeling religion has been reported and provided useful information to the society, while the ethnoecological studies about Bonokeling’s local knowledge related to the environment have not been reported. The research aimed to provide a comprehensive study about Bonokeling society on the management and utilization of natural resource and environment. This study used qualitative and quantitative approaches through participatory survey, open-ended interviews, and structured interviews with questionnaires. The results showed that the community recognized five environmental categorizations based on functions, namely settlements, home gardens, agricultural land, sacred sites, and irrigation sources. The plant diversity found were consisted of 288 species with 12 categories of uses. Pari is a species of cultivated plant that has the highest cultural importance value. The Bonokeling local knowledge can be scientifically proven has an ecological value. The management and utilization of agricultural land by the Bonokeling society have been carried out not only to optimize the production, but also provide the benefits to the environment. Besides, the management of sacred site has shown that traditional conservation practices have been maintained well for sustainability.
 

 

Keywords

conservation, ecological value, local knowledge, spatial landscape

Full Text:

PDF

References

Amin, D., 2002. Islam dan Kebudayaan Jawa. Gama Media. Yogyakarta.

Backer, C.A. and Bakhuizen Van der Brink., 1968. Flora of Java III. Noordhof, Walter, Groningen. Netherland.

Bassols, N.B. and Toledo, V.M., 2005. Ethnoecology of the Yucatec Maya: symbolism, knowledge and management of natural resources. JLAG, 4(1), pp.9–41.

Djaenudin, D., Hendrisman, M. dan Zaini, Z., 2006. Penelitian kesesuaian lahan tanaman pangan dan perkebunan; studi kasus di daerah Tanjung Bintang Provinsi Lampung. Jurnal Tanah Tropika, 12(1), pp.61–68.

Erfandi, D., 2012. Sistem Vegetasi dalam Penanganan Lahan Rawan Longsor pada Areal Pertanian. Badan Litbang Pertanian, Balai Penelitian Tanah. Bogor.

Flach, M. and Rumawas, F., 1996. Plant Resources of South East Asia (PROSEA) No 9. Plants Yielding Non Seed Carbohydrates. Bogor.

Galhena, H., Freed, R. dan Maredia, K.M., 2013. Home gardens: a promising approach to enhance household food security and wellbeing. Agr Food Scr, 2(8), pp.2–13.

Galluzzi, G., Eyzaguirre, P. dan Negri, V., 2010. Home gardens: neglected hotspots of agro-biodiversity and cultural diversity. Biodivers Conserv, 19(5), pp.105–118.

Hutterer, K. and Rambo, A.T., 1985. Introduction Cultural Values and Human Ecology in Southeast Asia. University of Michigan. Michigan.

IUCN., 2019. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2019-2.[internet]. [diuduh 2019 Juli 4]. Tersedia pada: www.iucnredlist.org.

Jumari, Setiadi, D., Purwanto, Y. dan Guhardja, E., 2012. Etnoekologi masyarakat Samin Kudus Jawa Tengah. Bioma, 14(1), pp.7–16.

Nasution A. 2019. Etnobiologi masyarakat suku Mandailing di desa sekitar Taman Nasional Batang Gadis Sumatera Utara. Tesis. Bogor (ID): Institut Pertanian Bogor.

[PEMKAB BANYUMAS] Pemerintah Kabupaten Banyumas. 2018. Profil Desa: Potensi dan Tingkat Perkembangan Desa Pekuncen Tahun 2018. Banyumas (ID): Pemkab. Banyumas.

[PEMKAB CILACAP] Pemerintah Kabupaten Banyumas. 2018. Profil Desa: Potensi dan Tingkat Perkembangan Desa Adiraja Tahun 2018. Cilacap (ID):Pemkab. Cilacap.

Prasetyo, B., Chikmawati, T., Walujo, E.B. dan Amzu, E., 2018. Ethnoecology: The traditional landscape of Osing Tribe in Banyuwangi, Indonesia. Biodiversitas, 19(6), pp. 2003–2009.

Purwanto, Y., 2003. Studi etnoekologi masyarakat Dani-Baliem dan perubahan lingkungan di Lembah Baliem Jaya Wijaya, Irian Jaya. Berita Biologi, 6(5), pp. 661–654.

Purwanto, Y. 2007. Etnobiologi. Ilmu interdisipliner, Metodologi, Aplikasi, dan Prosedurnya dalam Pengembangan Sumber Daya Tumbuhan. Pascasarjana IPB. Bogor.

Rahayu, M. dan Prawiroatmodjo., 2005. Keanekaragaman tanaman pekarangan dan pemanfaatannya di desa Lampeapi, Pulau Wawoni, Sulawesi Tenggara. Jurnal Teknik Lingkungan, 6(2), pp. 360–364.

Ramdhan, B., Chikmawati, T. dan Walujo, E.B., 2015. Perspektif kultural pengelolaan lingkungan pada masyarakat adat Cikondang kabupaten Bandung Jawa Barat. Jurnal Sumber Daya Hayati, 1(1), pp.7–14.

Setiani, N., Zakaria, W.A. dan Adawiyah, R., 2015. Analisis keuntungan usaha tani antar pola tanam di lahan sawah Desa Tata Karya kecamatan Abung Surakarta Kabupaten Lampung Utara. JIIA, 3(2), pp.122–129.

Tsuj, K., Ghazalli, M.N.F., Nordin, Z., Khaidizar, M.I., Dulloo, M.E., dan Sebastian, L.S., 2011. Biological and ethnobotanical characteristics of nipa palm (Nypa fruticans Wurmb). Sains Malays. 40(12), pp.1407–1412.

Turner, N.J., 1988. The Importance of a Rose: Evaluating the Cultural Significance of Plants in Thompson and Lillooet Interior Salish. Royal British Columbia Museum. British.

Walujo, E.B., Soedjito, H., Widjaja, E.A. dan Rifai, M.A. 1991. Penguasaan Etnoekologi Secuplikan Masyarakat Etnis di Indonesia. Makalah Utama pada KIPNAS V. LIPI.

Waluyo, E.B., 2008. Review: research ethnobotany in Indonesia and the future perspective. Biodiversitas, 9(1), pp.59–63.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14203/beritabiologi.v19i1.3785

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.