POTENSI Rhodococcus pyridinovorans GLB5 SEBAGAI BIOKATALIS DALAM KONVERSI SENYAWA METHIL SIANIDA DAN PHENIL SIANIDA

Nunik Sulistinah, Rini Riffiani, Bambang Sunarko
10.14203/beritabiologi.v15i1.2856
| Abstract views: 770 | PDF views: 843

Abstract

Nitrile and amide bioconversion have received increasing attention due to their ability to provide a range of commercially important chemicals. The experiment was conducted to investigate the potential of bacterial isolate GLB5 to convert methyl cyanide and phenyl cyanide. The samples were collected from various industrial waste. Selection of isolates to utilize  these substrates as a sole source of energy, carbon and nitrogen was conducted on 96 whell microtitter plates, based on the growth ability using INT (Iodo nitrotetrazolium chloride) reagent. Based on the growth  pattern, it showed that the bacterial isolate GLB5 grew well and it was capable of utilizing  methyl and phenyl cyanide compound as the sole source of carbon and nitrogen.  The isolate GLB5 was isolated from industrial waste of Batik factory in Cirebon, and  identified as Rhodococcus pyridinovorans. Bioconversion of methyl cyanide using whole cells of R. pyridinovorans GLB5 showed that ethanamide (C2H5NO) and ethanoic acid (C2H4O2) were detected. Formation of ethanamide and ethanoic acid as the product of bioconversion, indicated that the nitrile hydratase and amidase enzymes  involved in the bioconversion process. Phenyl carboxamide (C7H7NO) as the product of phenyl cyanide bioconversion was also detected,  although  in  low  concentration. In this study, R. pyridinovorans GLB5 was capable of completely converting 300 mM methyl cyanide to ±  140 mM ethanoic acid in relatively short times (<60 minutes).

Keywords

bioconversion, methyl cyanide, phenyl cyanide, Rhodococcus pyridinovorans GLB5, enzymes-converting nitrile.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Angelini LML, ARM da Silva, L de FC Rocco, and CD de F Milagre. 2015. A high –throughput screening assay for distinguishing nitrile hydratases from nitrilases. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology 46 (1), 113-116.

Banerjee A, R Sharma, and UC Banerjee. 2002. The nitriledegrading enzymes: current status and future prospects. Applied Microbiology Biotechnology 60, 33-44.

Chen J, RC Zheng, YG Zheng, and YC Shen. 2009. Microbial Transformation of Nitriles to High-Value Acids or Amides. A dvances Biochemical Engineering and Biotechnology 113, 33-77.

Dadd MR, TDW Claridge, R Walton , AJ Pettman, and CJ Knowles. 2001. Regioselective biotr ansfor mation of the dinitrile compounds 2-, 3- and 4-(cyanomethyl) benzonitrile by the soil bacterium Rhodococcus rhodochrous LL 100-21. Enzyme Microbial Technology, 20-27.

Harper DB. 1977. Micr obial Metabolism of Ar omatic Nitr iles :Enzymology of C-N Cleavage by Nocardia sp.(Rhodochrous group) N.C.I.B. 11216. Biochemical.Journal 165, 309-319.

Haroune N, B Combourieu, P Besse, M Sancelme, T Reemtsma, A Kloepfer, A Diab, JS Knapp, S Baumberg, and AM Delort. 2002. Benzothiazole degradation by Rhodococcus pyridinovorans strain PA: ev-idence of a catechol 1,2-dioxygenase activity. A pplied Environmental Microbiology 68, 6114–6120.

Janda MJ and S L Abbot. 2007. I6S r RNA Gene Sequencing for Bacterial Identification in Diagnosctic Laboratory:Pluses, Perils, and Pitfalls. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 45 (9), 2761-2764.

Kaushik N, S Biswas and J Singh. 2014. Biocatalysis and Biotransformation Processes- An Insight. The Science Technology Journal 01(08) , 15-17.

Kriszt B, A Tancsics, M Cserhati, A Toth, I Nagy, B Horvath, T. Tamura, J Kukolya, and S Szoboszlay. 2011. De Novo Genome Project for the Aromatic Degrader Rhodococcus pyridinivorans Strain AK37. Journal of Bacteriology, 1247-1248.

Meyer O and HG Schlegel. 1983. Biology of Aer obic Car bon Monoxide Oxidizing Bacteria. A nnual Review Microbiology 37, 277-310.

Pfennig N. 1974. Rhodopseudomonas globiformis sp.n., A new species of the Rhodospirillaceae. Archives Microbiology 100, 197-206.

Pandey J, A Chauhan, and RK Jain. 2009. Integrativeapproaches for assessing the ecological sustainability of insitu bioremediation. FEMS Microbiology Reviews. 33, 324–375.

Ramakrishna, N, H Dave, and M Ravindranathan. 1999. Microbial Metabolism of Nitrile and Its Biotechnological Potential. Journal of Scientific & Industrial Research, 58,925-947.

Santoshkumar M, AS Nayak, O Anjaneya, and TB Karegoudar. 2010. A plate method for scr eening of bacteria capable of degrading aliphatic nitriles. Journal Microbiolology and Biotechnology 37, 111-115.

Sulistinah N dan B Sunarko. 2010. Penapisan Mikroba Penghasil Enzim untuk Biotransformasi Senyawa Nitril. Berkala Penelitian Hayati (Journal of Biological Researches). Edisi Khusus No. 4F, 13-18.

Velankar H, KG Clarke, R du Prezz, DA Cowan and SG Burton. 2010. Developments in nitr ile and amide biotransformation processes. Trends in Biotechnology 28 (11), 561-569. Warhurst AM & CA Fewson. 1994.Biotr ansfor mation catalyzed by the genus Rhodococcus. Citrical Review Biotechnology 14, 29-37.

Yamamoto K, K Oishi, I Fujimatsu, and KI Komatsu. 1991. Production of R-(-)- Mandelic Acid from Mandelonitrile by A lcaligenes faecalis ATCC 8750. A pplied and Environmental Microbiology, 3028-3032.

Yoon JH, SS Kang, YG Cho, ST Lee, YH Kho, CJ Kim and YH Park. 2000. Rhodococcus pyridinivorans sp. nov., a pyridine-degrading bacterium. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology 50, 2173-2180.

Yusuf F, A Chaubey, A Raina, U Jamwal and R Parshad. 2013. Enhancing nitrilase production from Fusarium proliferatum using Response Surface Methodology 2, 1-7. Springer Plus, India.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14203/beritabiologi.v15i1.2856

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.