ISOLASI DAN IDENTIFIKASI Pseudomonas DARI TANAH KEBUN BIOLOGI WAMENA DAN UJI AWAL SEBAGAI AGEN BIOKONTROL Fusarium

HJD Latupapua, N Nurhidayat
10.14203/beritabiologi.v6i5.1189
| Abstract views: 725 | PDF views: 1876

Abstract

Pseudomonas bacteria plays essential role in soil ecology such as decomposer and biological control. The bacteria were isolated on selective media and identified from five soil samples taken within area of Wamena Biological Gardens.There are six species Pseudomonas were indentified based on morphological characters and biochemical reaction.P. striata was found to be common in soil of the area.No pathogen Pseudomonas was indentified in all soil samples. Preliminary study on biological control for fungal pathogen Fusarium indicated that P. fluorescens, P. striata and P. cepacia have ability to inhibit Fusarium growth in vitro.

Keywords

Isolasi/isolation, identifikasi/identification, Kebun Biologi Wamena/The Wamena Biological Gardens, Pseudomonas, Fusarium, Biokontrol/Biocontrol.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Aspiras RB and AR de la Cruz. 1986. Potential Biological Control of Bacterial Wilt in Tomato and Potato With Bacillus polymyxa FU6 and Pseudomonas fluorescens in G.J. Blair DA, Ivory and TR Evans (Eds.). Forages in Southeast Asian and South Pasific Agriculture. Proceedings of International Workshop, 89-92.

Bonn WG, RD Gitaitis and BH MacNeil. 1985. Epiphytic Survival of Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato on Tomato Transplants Shipped from Georgia. Plant Disease 6 (1), 58-60.

Chen C, EM Bauske, G Musson, RR Kabana and W. J. Kloepper. 1995. Biological Control of Fusarium Wilt on Cotton by Use of Endophytic Bacteria. Biological Control 5, 83-91.

Colyer PD and MS Mount. 1984. Bacterization of Potatoes with Pseudomonas putida and Its Influence on Postharvest Soft Rot Diseases. Plant Disease 68 (81), 703-706

Dupler M and R Baker. 1984. Survival of Pseudomonas putida, a Biological Control Agent in Soil. Phytopathology.

Fackrell HB and RC Sinha. 1983. Serological Analysis of Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato. Phytopathology 73 (2), 178-181.

Getz S, CT Stephens and DW Fulbright. 1983. Influence of Development Stage on Susceptibility of Tomato Fruit to Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato. Phytopathology 71 (1), 36-38.

Gitaitis RD, JB Jones, CA Jaworski and SC Phatak. 1985. Incidence and Development of Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae on Tomato Transplants in Georgia. Plant Disease 69 (1), 32-35.

Glick, R Bernard and JJ Pasternak. 1994. Molecular Biotechnology: Principles and Application of Recommbinat DNA. ASM Press, Washington, DC.

Lim D. 1998. Microbiology. Second Edition. WBC. McGraw-Hill, Boston.

Mazzola M, DK Fujimoto, LS Thomashow and RJ Cook. 1995. Variation in Sensitivity of Gaeumannomyces graminis to Antibiotics Produced by Flourescent Pseudomonas spp. and Effect on Biological Control of Take All of Wheat. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 61 (7), 2554-2559.

Sivan A and I Chet. 1993. Integrated Control of Fusarium Crown and Root Rot of Tomato with Trichoderma harzianum in Combination with Methyl Bromide or Soil Solarization. Crop Protection, 12 (5), 380-386.

Styer RC and DJ Cantliffe. 1984. Infection of Two Endosperm of Sweet Corn by Fusarium moniliforme and Its Effect on Seedling Vigor. Phytopathology 74 (2), 189-194.

Wardlaw CW. 1961. Banana Diseases, Including Plantains and Abaca. Longmans.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14203/beritabiologi.v6i5.1189

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.