KERAGAMAN GENETIK, HERTTABILITAS DAN KORELASI BEBERAPA KARAKTER AGRONOMI PADA GALUR F2 HASIL PERSILANGAN KACANG HIJAU (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek)

Lukman Hakim
| Abstract views: 3350 | PDF views: 3114

Abstract

The F2 progenies of two crosses among three mungbean varieties were evaluated with their parents (Varsha, Park it and Local Belu)at Muara Experimental Station, Bogor during dry season of 2007. The experiment was conducted in a randomized complete block design with three replications. The seed of each F2 progenies and parents were planted in four rows of four meters long.Plant spacing was 40 x 20 cm, each will contained one plant. Among the character studies, days to maturity, seed yield per plant and plant height had the highest coefficient of variability, with the mean of 51.3%, 49.8%, and 49.2% respectively.Number of branches, pod length and number of seed per pod had the lowest coefficient of variability, and the mean were 19.1%, 18.8%, and 17.6%.The heritability estimates of nine agronomic characters studied ranged from IS.6 to 65.2%. Plant height and number of pods per planthad the highest heritability estimates with mean of 65.2% and 58.6% respectively for the two crosses. The mean heritabilityestimate for seeds yield per plant, pod length and number of seeds per pod were the lowest of 19.4%, 18.3% and 15.6% respectively. Based on the F2 data, selection of plant height and days to maturity had the highest expected genetic advance of 45.8 and 41.0%.The mean expected genetic advance for pod length and number of seeds per pod were the lowest of 19.4 and 17.4%.Correlation coefficient between grain yield with plant height, number of pods per plant and seed size were positively significant (r = 0.404, 0.613 and 0.422 respectively). Correlation coefficient between grain yield with other agronomic characters were small or negative. Therefore, plant height, number of pods per plant and seed size can be used as the selection criteria in selecting mungbean genotypes for high yield.

Keywords

Galur kacang hijau, keragaman genetik, heritabilitas, korelasi, karakter agronomi.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Ali MS and MAQ Shaikh. 1987. Variability and correlation studies in summer mungbean (vigna radiata). Bangladesh Agric. Journal 12, 63-71.

Amanullah and M Hatam. 2000. Correlation between grain yield and agronomic parameters in mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek). Pakistan Journal of Biological Science 3, 242-244.

Arshad M, M Aslam and M Irshad 2007. Genetic variability and character association among morphological traits of mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek) genotypes. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Research. Quarterly. P:l-4.

Briggs FN and PF. Knowles 1967. Selection in self-pollinated crops. Introduction to Plant Breeding. Reinhold Books Agric. Science. Davis California. 426 p.

Empig LT, RM Lantican and PB Escuro. 1970. Heritability estimates of quantitative characters in mungbean (Phaseolus aureus Roxt). Crop Science 10, 240-241.

Giriraj K and S Vijayakumar. 1974. Path-coefficient analysis of yield attributes in mungbean. Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding 34, 27-30.

Gupta SN, S Lai, L Rai and YS Toner. 1982. Correlation and path analysis in mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek). Haryana Agric. University Journal of Research 12, 287-291.

Gupta MP and RB Singh. 1969. Variability and correlation studies in greengram (Phaseolus aureus Roxb). Indian Journal of Agric. Science 39, 482-493.

Joshi SN and MM Kabaria. 1973. Interrelationship between yield and yield components in phaseolus aureus Roxb. Madras Agric. Journal 60, 1331-1334.

Khalid MG, MA Rajput and KH Tahir. 1984. Genetic variability and path coefficient analysis in greengram (Vigna radiata). Pakistan Journal Agricultural Science 27, 24-33.

Luthtra JP and KB Singh 1978. Genetic variability and correlation in the F3 population of greengram (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek). Indian Journal Agric. Science 46, 723-729.

Malhotra RS. 1983. Genetic of pod length, seeds per pod and seed size in mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek). Genetics Agraria 37, 345-354.

Malik BPS, VP Singh and BD Chaudhary . 1982. Path coefficients and selection indices in greengram. Indian Journal of Agric. Science 52, 288-291.

Mansoor H, M Ubada and AR Rao. 2002. Evaluation of mungbean germplasm from Baluchistan. Asian Network for Scientific Information. Journal Biological Science 2 (1), 21-24.

Medhi BN, NM Hazarika and RK Chaudhary. 1980. Genetic variability and heritability for seed yield components in greengram. Tropical Grain Legumes Bulletin 17, 32-34.

Misra RC. 1985. Criteria for choice of characters for construction of selection indices in greengram. Madras Agric. Journal 72,265-271.

Murty BK, GJ Patel and BG Jasiani. 1976. Gene action and heritability estimates of some quantitative traits in mungbean. Gujarat Research Journal 2,1-4.

Parida D and DP Singh . 1984. Association, heritability and genetic advance in the F2 generation of wide and varietal crosses of greengram. Madras Agric. Journal 71, 351-356.

Poehlman JM. 1991. Genetic of Quantitative Characters. The Mungbean. Westview Press. Boulder, Colorado.

Pundir SR, KR Gupta and VP Singh. 1992. Studies on correlation coefficient analysis in mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek). Harayana Agricultural University Journal Research 22, 256-258.

Rathnaswamy R, S Krishnaswamy and PV Marappan. 1978. Estimates of variability, correlation coefficients and path coefficient analysis in early maturing mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek). Madras Agricultural Journal 65, 188-190.

Rochman MM and ASM Hussain. 2003. Genetic Variability, correlation and path analysis in mungbean. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences 2, 17-24.

Samsuzzaman KM, RH Khan and MA Shaikh. 1983. Genetic variability and character association in mungbean. Bangladesh Journal Agricultural Research 8, 1-5.

Sandhu TS, HS Cheema and AS Gill. 1979. Variability and inter-relationship between yield and yield components in mungbean. Indian Journal of Genetic and Plant Breeding 39, 480-484.

Sandhu TS, BS Bhullar and JS Brar. 1980. Path coefficient analysis for grain yield and its attributes in greengram. Indian Journal of Agricultural Science 50, 541-544.

Satyan BA, KS Prakash and ARG Ranganatha. 1986. Yield structure analysis in mungbean. Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding 46, 558-562.

Singh TP and KB Singh . 1973. Association of grain yield and its component in segregating population of greengram. Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding 33, 112-117.

Steel RGD and JM Torrie . 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistic. Second edition. Me Graw Hill Co. Inc. New York, USA.

Singh KB and RS Malhotra. 1970. Estimates of genetic and environmental variability in mungbean (phaseolus aureus Roxb.). Madras Agricultural Journal 57,155- 159.

Sumarno dan N Zuraida. 2006. Hubungan korelatif dan kausatif antara komponen hasil dengan hasii kedelai. Jurnal Penelitian Pertanian Tanaman Pangan 25 (D.38-43.

Tickoo JL, CS Ahn, HK Chen and S Shanmugasundaram. 1988. Utilization of the genetic variability from AVRDC mungbean germplasm. Proceedings of the Second International Mungbean Symposium, 103-110.AVRDC, Taiwan.

Tomar GS, L Singh and PK Mishra. 1973. Correlation and path coefficient analysis of yield characteristic in mungbean. SABRAO Newsletter 5, 125-129.

Veeraswamy R, R Rathnaswamy and GA Palanisamy. 1973. Genetic variability in some quantitative characters of phaseolus aureus Roxb. Madras Agricultural Journal 60, 1320-1322.

Verma MM and SS Sandhu. 1988. Development of mungbean varieties for favorable environments, a new selection methodology. Proceedings of the Second International Mungbean Symposium, 159-163. AVDRC, Taiwan.

Yohe JM and JM Poehlman. 1972. Genetic variability in the mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek). Crops Science 12, 461-464.

Yohe JM and JM Poehlman. 1975. Regressions, correlation and combining ability in mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek). Tropical Agricultural 52, 343-352.

Zubair M. 2004. Genetic diversity and gene action in mungbean. Pakistan Research Repository. University of Arid Agriculture, 1-8. Rawalpindi. 32


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.